Thursday, January 24, 2008

Simply Google

John Maeda of Laws of Simplicity fame has created an official theme for iGoogle.  iGoogle constructs a homepage for your browser much like yahoo provides.  It is an interesting theme of shapes and colors that change each time you access it.  Probably too much color for me but I am going to live with it for a while to see if it grows on me.  Thanks to Len Accardi of my University of Pennsylvania HCI class for calling my attention to this.



One suggestion on studying Maeda's Laws of Simplicity .  Although the web page is a great place for discussion and listing of the laws, you have to read the book with Maeda's commentary to get the full impact of his study of simplicity.  One particularly discouraging comment of a student in one of my classes was why not just list the laws rather than requiring the book.  One really has no chance of getting what Maeda's is trying to accomplish without reading his book and commentary regarding the laws.



His book will definitely make my Valentine's Day list of books to suggest to your significant other as potential Valentine's gifts for yourself.



Later!



Friday, January 4, 2008

RISD Business

I recently discovered that John Maeda, author of The Laws of Simplicity, will become RISD's president in June of 2008. RISD, Rhode Island School of Design, is a remarkable place. RISD's mission says it all:

RISD fulfills its contemporary mission by providing the highest quality instruction in the visual arts, design, architecture and art education to prepare its students and the broader community to be creative and responsive to the needs of a global society.



IMHO both made a great choice and I will keep you posted on their joint growth. It should be simply amazing.



Later and Happy New Year!



Monday, November 12, 2007

OLPC

It is fitting that my 100th post on this blog be about One Laptop Per Child. I have discussed OLPC in many of my classes, both as an intriquing concept and an example of focused design and Human Computer Interaction principles. You can read much more about OLPC here.



All of this is great, but the real reason I ma posting on this yet again is to encourage you to buy an OLPC. Yes you can buy one in a special 1 for 2 deal! Yes I said a ! for 2 deal. For a very limited time you can buy one OLPC machine for the price of two. The second one will be given to a child in a third world country an dyou will get a $200 dollar tax deduction. I have already ordered and, with shipping, my total came to $423.95.



I encourage anyone who thinks this is a neat idea and can afford it to do the same. You can begin the process at this site. This special offer i sfor 15 days from November 12th to November 26th, 2007. Get a great piece of technology and give a child in the world a very special gift for the price of a stripped down Playstation 3.



When I get my OLPC I will post my impressions here and on my other blog.



If you do order one, I would appreciate adding a comment to this post. Thanks!



Later!



Friday, September 21, 2007

One Web Day - It is about us!

Tomorrow, September 22nd, is the Second Annual One Web Day. As the OWD site proclaims: "The Web is worth celebrating. OneWebDay is one day a year when we all - everyone around the physical globe - can celebrate the Web and what it means to us as individuals, organizations, and communities."



One Web Day was started by Susan Crawford, a person of boundless energy and commitment, to celebrate the web and its contribution to the world. Many web luminaries such as Tim Berners-Lee, the father of the web, have added their message about OWD and it can be found here.



I find the web particularly special to this blog, since my web classes have introduced me to many individuals that I know and continue to communicate and share ideas solely through the web. The web has indeed provided personal and professional growth for many of us and that alone would make it worth celebrating an dreflecting on how we can make it better.



For those of you in the New York Area, you can attend activities and parties listed here.



Join in the celebration of One Web Day and visit this site for planning the third OWD. My goal is to get many educational institutions involved. Please contact me if you would like to help. Later!



Thursday, August 9, 2007

Bartlett's Err, Rajapakse's Familiar Quotations

Bartlett's Familiar Quotations is a great place to explore "sound bites" from great literature. I find them useful for lectures, papers and t to explore some interesting nooks and crannies of great literature by taking the quote and then "reading around it" to get the context. In fact John Bartlett had a great quote about his quotes, "I have gathered a posie of other men's flowers, and nothing but the thread that binds them is my own."



Several weeks ago (by way of doggdot, I think) I discovered Damath Rajapakse's collection of Software Engineering quotes and had a great time sampling the quotations. Dr. Rajapakse has done a great service for software engineering students and lecturers alike. It is a highly recommended site to visit and bookmark, especially for folks interested in software engineering. Enjoy it and thanks to Dr. Rajapakse for creating such an entertaining and useful compilation.



Later!



Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Architectural Attributes

Hard to believe I am still working my way through posting great log entries from folks in the Spring term. This log entry from Deborah Ford in my Software Architecture and Design Class at Stevens lists great attributes for a software architect. I like that she emphasizes domain knowledge, breadth of experience, communication skills and mutual respect (architect should respect designers and developers; designers and developers and designers should respect the architect). In many ways that is a great formula for any leadership role but it is especially the case for the architect. I would like to thank Deborah for letting me share these with you. The key excerpt from Deborah's log entry:



Out of this (my experience) I’ve concluded that there are certain keys to success for architecture teams:



1. This isn’t necessarily a job for the most creative designer or best technician. It is more important to get someone who understands the big picture and can bring differing views to consensus or make a judgment when the situation calls for it.

2. Don’t farm out architecture roles to outside contractors – you are investing your knowledge capital in people who don’t have such a compelling reason to stay and can be at the whim of budgetary fluctuations. You are also giving lots of domain knowledge that your competitors may be able to take advantage of further down the line.

3. Team members should have a wide exposure and not be too wed to any particular technology or internal organization. I am wary of people who have spent their entire working career in a single organization.

4. They must be people who have the respect of the teams that they work with.

5. They must have a good grasp of the business domain.

6. They must not be seen as too allied with any single development organization



Hopefully, I will increase my volume of posts in the next few weeks since I have some backlog and a fresh stack of 30 logbooks to read from my summer classes! Later!



Tuesday, June 12, 2007

A Growth Opportunity

One of the management euphemisms I have heard repeatedly over the years is  "growth opportunity," generally meaning a difficult, unpleasant or impossible assignment that is usually an offer you can't refuse.  William Lapenta from the spring Stevens Quantitative Software Engineering class, wrote this entry in his log and he provides valuable suggestions on how to deal with one class of growth opportunity, being handed responsibility without the necessary authority.  I hope you enjoy it and will offer additional suggestions on how you would deal with the situation.   Later!





Responsibility Without Authority



William Lapenta



One of the toughest types of situations professionals in any area of business can find themselves in is one where they are assigned responsibility for an issue without being given the appropriate authority to complete the task at hand.  This scenario is one that can be all too familiar to the developer or Software Engineer in charge of a complex and diverse project.  It seems that software projects lend themselves to this type of problem naturally. A developer, architect or SE must learn to tread carefully to successfully navigate through these waters.



What can often happen is that you may be given the task of implementing a system or project that interfaces with several other systems not under your domain of authority.  Learning how to deal with one’s peers can be as or more important than knowing how to deal with sub-ordinates or superiors.  When the line of command is not clear I have found that the best approach can be one of using more carrots than sticks.  The best solution to a problem, where you are not getting the co-operation you believe you need from a peer, is to somehow convince that person to assist you voluntarily.  Raising the issue to a higher level of authority should be your last line of attack, even if you believe you are one hundred percent in the right. 



Some methods that you might use in cases like this are:   Appeal to your antagonist’s sense of self worth.  When soliciting a peer’s assistance, tell them how important their piece of the project is and that you understand how difficult a task you are requesting of them.  By letting them have an elevated sense of self-worth, they may just complete the task out of pride.  Give them as much positive feed back as you can for any part of the task they have already undertaken.  Let them know how grateful you will be if they can assist you and that you would repay them in kind if the need arose.  Be willing to work around their schedule. If you are at a bottleneck due to this type of situation, it is better to have to put in the extra effort resolving the problem than having to explain your failure to your superiors.



If all else fails you may need to delegate the issue upward.  By this I mean, that there sometimes comes a point when you may need to finally raise the issue to a higher level.  This step should be taken very carefully and only as a last resort.  Once a bridge is burned, it can be very difficult or impossible to rebuild.  Remember, you will most likely have to work and deal with the person you are confronting currently again in the future.  It is almost always more beneficial to bite the bullet, swallow some pride and put in the extra effort to resolve a situation amicably (at least from your foil's perspective) than to come away with a successfully resolution for your current project while leaving hard feelings and an environment of ill will with your peers behind.